300

October 27th, 2007

Well, I finally got around to seeing it. It was probably more impressive in the theater, of course, and I regret not seeing it there. Visually, it was impressive. Unique, even. While I never read the original comic it seems very faithful to what the style of the comic must have been. In terms of the production value, battle sequences, and so forth, it was very good. Of course, there was some disturbing subtext:

  • Infanticide is a crucial part of the social order.
  • Foreigners are inhuman monsters. People with congenital defects are not to be trusted. Black people are evil. Asians are evil. People from the Middle East are evil. And they aren’t very manly, either.
  • Warlike kings are honorable and trustworthy, pacifists are not to be trusted. Any check against the leader’s power to make war is antiquated, and anyone who tries to uphold those laws is actually a traitor.

Sure, you may point out that some (but not all) of these ideas were prevalent in ancient Sparta. That’s not the point. Ancient Sparta was what it was—portraying them as artificially noble and freedom-living while vilifying the Persians turns it from epic to cartoonish. (It’s up to you to decide whether “being cartoonish” is a bad thing for a comic book adaptation.) And yes, it’s disturbing that the primary method of vilifying the Persians was to turn them into non-white queers, in case we ever confused them with the white hetero Spartans. The badass-warrior-culture that goes out and kicks ass is such a great idea that’s pulled off so well in so many other places, but making them sympathetic the way 300 did just blunts that. I want to have some evil in my antiheroes, and 300 bleaches it out, with a lot of implicit bigotry tainting the whole thing.

It was a lot better than I had feared, but I still don’t think it’s nearly as good as people say it was.

I am embarrassed for my university.

September 27th, 2007

Nerds to Auction Themselves to Women

PULLMAN, Wash. (AP) — Looking to recruit more women, and perhaps date some sorority girls, the largest computer club at Washington State University hopes to hold a “nerd auction.” The idea is to trade their computer skills to sorority girls in exchange for a makeover and, possibly, a date.

“You can buy a nerd and he’ll fix your computer, help you with stats homework, or if you’re really adventurous, take you to dinner!” Ben Ford, president of the Linux Users Group, said on its Web site recently.

Ford acknowledged that some of the group’s 213 registered members may not be ready for the auction block.

“The problem is that we’re all still nerds. Let’s face it, guys. If anyone’s going to bid on us, we’ll need some spicing up,” he wrote. “And who better to help with that than sorority girls who like nothing better than a makeover?”

Source

This is the dumbest idea I’ve ever heard of. Of course, the entire reason for this was mentioned later on:

This all began as an effort to recruit more women into computer science progams…

Somehow, I doubt that perpetuating the stereotype that college-age women are too stupid to operate and maintain their computers without the assistance of male nerds will help this. (Even if it is true, it’s more of a self-fulfilling prophecy than any inherent problem with women, and perpetuating the stereotype only makes it worse.) And while it’s no secret that computer enthusiasts are generally male nerds with little ability to attract women, I don’t think advertising this generalization will attract women to computer science programs either.

A public relations class decided to help by studying the social dynamics of the Linux group, which focuses on the use of the computer operating system.

Fortunately, it wasn’t the PR class that came up with this dumb idea; it was Ben Ford, in the shower. I say “fortunately” because WSU’s communications department has a good reputation as far as communications departments go, and after this level of national embarrassment I want there to be something left over for WSU to be proud of.

Koch Foods

August 30th, 2007

From the Washington Times:

Federal immigration agents, assisted by local police and sheriff’s deputies, raided one of the nation’s largest suppliers of fresh and frozen poultry products yesterday and arrested more than 160 illegal aliens.

At the risk of being identified as “just another libertarian blogger”, I’m going to write a post complaining about the government. Again.

While the government is applauding itself for arresting over a hundred people for the crime of making whatever small living they could for themselves and their families without going through its obstacle course of regulations, I think I’m going to ruin their party by pointing out how they just wasted their time and ruined a bunch of people’s lives for no good reason.

First, the big reason people (demagogues) complain about illegal immigration is crime. Illegal immigrants are criminal gangsters who deal drugs and rape children and run over people while drunk on their tequila—to hear O’Reilly say it. Well, something makes me doubt that people who work 9 to 5 at the chicken factory are really part of the hispanic mafia. Maybe because they work for less-than-minimum wage at a chicken factory instead of rolling in cash from their marijuana deals?

Second, suppose they actually crack down on Koch and they don’t hire any more undocumented immigrants. Guess what happens? Some other, as-yet-unknown chicken factory opens up, and either Koch loses business, or they outsource to the illegal chicken factory. They ride this for a few years until the police raid them. Wash, rinse, repeat. (As a matter of fact, this is what police usually do with escort services—letting them build up some assets they can seize through asset forfeiture before deigning to bust them.) The only people getting penalized are the people who leave their native country for a shitty job at a chicken plant. Good job crushing what little hope these people have.

Statism without honor, humanity, or mathematical consistency:

August 28th, 2007

I can’t help but note this story, which is either horribly written, or is accurately portraying the most horribly-written political agenda ever put forward. Here’s some choice quotes:

Nationwide, two-thirds of U.S. adults are obese or overweight, according to the fourth annual report from the Trust for America’s Health, titled “F as in Fat: How Obesity Policies are Failing in America.” The report’s co-author says the government needs to treat this trend as an epidemic that threatens the health of Americans and put in place a national plan to combat obesity.

“The key recommendation in the report is we need a national strategy,” said report co-author Jeffrey Levi.

He noted that the federal government has created a comprehensive plan to be implemented in the event of an outbreak of pandemic flu.

Emphasis mine.

Something tells me that pandemic flu is not quite like obesity. For one thing, obesity is not directly contagious. For another thing, obesity is not spread by airborne pathogens. Furthermore, pandemic flu can kill millions of people within months. Yes, obesity can be fatal too, but there’s a difference between “you should eat better or you’re more susceptible to diabetes and heart disease” and “if you step outside this month you have a good chance of dying of influenza weeks later”. And this is even without considering the fundamental issue—obesity is a condition that’s up to the individual to address, pandemic flu is a public safety hazard just like a wildfire or sniper. One of these things is fundamentally something that should be addressed by the government, and the other is an issue of personal health.

Now let’s play “spot the statistical inconsistency:”

Nationwide, two-thirds of U.S. adults are obese or overweight, according to the fourth annual report from the Trust for America’s Health, titled “F as in Fat: How Obesity Policies are Failing in America.”

….

In 32 states, 60 percent of the population is either overweight or obese. West Virginia ranks highest in the combined statistic, with nearly two-thirds of its adults obese or overweight.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think that’s mathematically possible.

There’s two fundamental points this report fundamentally misses, alongside its strident stupidity in such things as analogy-crafting and statistics. One is a fundamental philosophical point: other people’s bodies are not the personal business of the “Trust for America’s Health” or the report’s co-author Jeffrey Levi. Are Americans too obese, on average? Yeah, probably. Who cares?

The second point is that the recommendations do nothing to address why Americans suddenly are getting fatter. America did not have more farmer’s markets, higher food stamp benefits, or vegetable snack programs in schools before we got fat, why on earth is the lack of them suddenly a causative factor? I don’t have all the answers, but I have one: the federal government, in its infinite desire to mollify both multinational agribusiness and American farmers, have decided that America shall put a tariff on imported sugar. Not only does this help all eight farmers growing sugar in the United States (what next, protectionism for Alaska’s orange growers?), but this also is a major boon to the corn industry, who can now sell something called “high fructose corn syrup” as a sugar substitute. Ever notice how Coke tastes so much better in Canada or another foreign country? That’s because US Coke uses corn syrup, while Coke in all other countries is made with sugar. From what I’ve gathered, high fructose corn syrup, along with fattening the wallets of the corn syrup producers, also affects the insulin differently from sugar, fattening our bodies as well.

I’m not saying it’s a great thing to drink all that much Coke, mind you. Just that Americans drank just as much Coke before high fructose corn syrup and didn’t get as fat as they are now. What Jeffrey Levi and “Trust for America’s Health” misses is that it’s not the lack of new federal interferences that’s to blame—it’s the federal interferences that have already happened.

The moon rules!

August 27th, 2007

My class schedule this year has absurdly early classes three days a week (9 AM on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday) and absurdly late classes two days a week (3 PM to 9 PM on Tuesdays, 3 to 7 on Thursdays). Almost fittingly, however, this corresponds very well to tonight’s total eclipse of the fucking moon, which ends at 4:22 AM, leaving 8 hours of sleep before I get up at a leisurely noon and prepare for class.

With that settled, I’m not sure what I’m going to do. I can’t very well sacrifice a virgin, since I’m not in favor of human sacrifice, to say nothing of the challenge of finding one at this late date. I’m also not sure where to go to see it. While I don’t know if the observatory itself will be open, it might be worth driving up there just because the hill is a prime viewing spot. (Of course it is, that’s where the observatory is!)

I do, however, have the music picked out—Dark Side of the Moon. True, the album is arguably more befitting of a solar eclipse (particularly in its final lyrics), but the sound is more befitting of nighttime.

A pun fails

June 22nd, 2007

Philip Welch: Did you know I lost ten pounds this last week?
Jennifer Lee: Um, without being snarky, how on earth would I know that? And congrats.
Philip Welch: Yeah, and 20 pounds the week before. That’ll teach me to invest in the British stock market!
Jennifer Lee: …
Jennifer Lee: *rolls eyes*

Philip Welch: Did you know I lost ten pounds this last week?
Mike Klein: I didn’t — how did you do that?
Mike Klein: Did you invest in Starbucks UK?

Political cartoon

June 4th, 2007

Jousting with conspiracy nutjobs

May 30th, 2007

I’m spending some of my free time on Slashdot jousting with people who think that the World Trade Center was destroyed by planted explosives (and not by, for instance, gigantic jetliners that crashed into it and the resultant shock and fire damage). I think this latest exchange is my coup de gras:

I sum it all up:

You know, whoever designed the WTC must be pretty happy that you have so much faith in them that you think it’s more plausible that reptilian Jewish Freemasons from the outer space Illuminati secretly planted explosives than they were simply more vulnerable to aircraft and debris collision than they hoped.

I continue, further down the thread:

Building implosions are carefully controlled to avoid property damage to surrounding buildings. You want to get it down to a less than 1% chance of damaging other buildings. That doesn’t mean that, if a building collapses uncontrolled, it’s guaranteed to damage other buildings. It only means that random building collapses have an unacceptably high probability (which in practice may mean greater than 1%, or even greater than 0.1%) of damaging other buildings. Besides, it makes no sense to suppose WTC 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition, because WTC 1 and 2 *did* cause damage to surrounding buildings (thus making it inconsistent to be so cautious with WTC 7) and because there’s no reason to make a neatly contained implosion when your objective is to destroy inhabited office buildings to further your Masonic plot from outer space.

He finally clarified who his villain was:

Masons from space? WTF is wrong with you? The milatary-industrial-congress complex has the means and the motives to get this done. Their budgets and influence were steadily declining after the end of the cold war:

I school him on building implosions again and point out all the strange parts of his theory:

Why would the military-industrial complex (thanks for updating me on which perennial conspiracy-theory villain you’re using!) destroy WTC7 so that it would collapse neatly into its own footprint, while failing to destroy WTC 1 and 2 the same way? Why would the military-industrial complex be worried about protecting other buildings from damage when they were deliberately committing an act of terrorism? Why would they go to all the effort to make 19 predominantly Saudi nationals all appear at the same time on the four airplanes they crashed, with Arabic-speaking voices on the cockpit recorders, if they had no intention of attacking Saudi Arabia? Why would they bother crashing planes into the towers if they was rigged with explosives to start with? Why did they arbitrarily restrain the attack to the WTC and Pentagon? Why did none of the 100,000 WTC inhabitants ever notice the explosives being installed? How come no one has come forth admitting to being a part of this gigantic conspiracy? I think the more important question is–what, other than your political biases, leads you to choose a gigantic conspiracy theory over thinking that maybe you were wrong about building collapses?

Incredibly, his response contains both these lines:

Do you make mommy type for you? ‘Cause you sound too stupid to tie your own shoes.

All of your questions have been answered, all the data has been made available to you.
Don’t troll this thread anymore.

along with a bizarre claim that the military-industrial complex didn’t want to damage buildings because they owned all of them.

And my final response:

Drat and curses, you’ve found me out. I am indeed an agent of the Zionist-controlled military-industrial complex that evidently owns all the real estate in New York! While you have foiled my mission this time, be assured that our resources are far more extensive than your own!

Seriously, though, I’d love to live in your world for like one day. I’m sure life is interesting if you see fiendish plots worthy of Lex Luthor around every historical event.

Quote of the week

May 29th, 2007

It may be worth noting that the Westfield Mall and Disney security tried to bar the zombies from entering, but Apple store security did not. In fact, salespeople were jostling one another for a position where they could take the best photo of the zombies (or themselves with the zombies, or their brains being eaten by the zombies).

From News.com.com.com

Badass of the month

May 28th, 2007

Arthur Du Mosch of Israel wrestled down a leopard that jumped into his bedroom during the middle of the night, and pinned it until park rangers could arrive to take it away.