Archive for the ‘Commentary’ Category

On guns, adulthood, and freedom

Monday, August 18th, 2008

From a recent argument I made about guns:

The main issue here isn’t guns: it’s a philosophical dispute between people who trust individuals and people who trust institutions. I won’t belabor this point—it’s difficult to point out these holistic connections on a forum where we’re supposed to “keep on topic” and where some pedant will quibble with each concrete example you give without even addressing the point—but it bears explication. Some people want some benevolent overseeing institution (usually government) to provide completely for their health, physical safety, economic well-being, and so forth—other people want to take these things into their own hands. Some people believe that human individuals are incapable of responsibly making life and death decisions, just as some people believe that human individuals are incapable of choosing their own food, saving for their own retirement, choosing (and providing for) their own medical care, raising their children, and so forth. More specifically, these people believe that some sort of institution can take care of us, protecting us from ourselves, and providing for us, better than we can do so for ourselves.

And then there are those of us who take the contrary view: that an adult human being ought not be parented by the government.

Now, it’s true that some people *do* need to be parented by the government. I’m not sure what to do about them. As a culture, it’s more important for us to raise our children so that they become the type of adults who don’t need to be parented anymore. But those of us who believe we can live as adults instead of perpetual wards of the state—we really don’t appreciate the rest of you trying to be Mommy and Daddy for us. Treating those of us who can live as adults as if we were children oppresses us. We’re not necessarily anarchists—we’ll chip in to lock up those loonies who plant homemade land mines on the sidewalk, or to stop the coal plant next door from belching sulphur into the air, or even to build roads and sewer systems that help us all in the long run. But we’re responsible folks, and we think we can wield the power of life and death just as safely and responsibly as the battalion of uniformed men with guns you want to hire—if not more so.

Progressive Nation 2008 (Dream Theater, Opeth, Between the Buried and Me, 3)

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008

I was in Seattle yesterday to see Progressive Nation 2008, a package tour of prog/prog metal bands headlined by Dream Theater. Summary: it kicked ass.

The venue was the WaMu Theater at the Qwest Field Event Center. The venue was conveniently located just south of Qwest Field near downtown Seattle (in SoDo), and had acceptable acoustics for a rock concert. Since I want to lead with the positives, this is all I’m going to say about the venue at this point.

At 6:30, we were treated to a short set from a band I had never even heard of before, Three. They were definitely my favorite of the three opening bands. Three weren’t especially heavy, but they were an incredible mix of different influences, thoroughly progressive and constantly inventive and interesting. Definitely recommended.

Three was followed up by Between the Buried and Me. While I wasn’t especially impressed with them, they did manage to kick some ass with two, 15-minute songs that packed plenty of punch, complete with death metal vocals.

Opeth came on next with a one-hour set showing their chops both in death metal and in more melodic rock. Opeth frontman Mikael Åkerfeldt, incidentally, has a great, strong, understated stage presence, and related to the audience using understated humor between songs. After a couple death metal songs he introduced a ballad with a short speech that began, “We used to be a death metal band.” Afterwards, he introducing perhaps the heaviest, darkest song in their set, with another speech beginning, “We used to be a death metal band.”

Dream Theater’s set began with a short video introduction, leading straight into “Constant Motion”, which led off a powerful but surprisingly brief set. (In retrospect, the set was probably longer than it seemed at the time, but for someone who came mostly to see Dream Theater it wasn’t quite long enough.) Bassist John Myung briefly joined Mike Portnoy on the drums a few songs in, and John Petrucci had several beautiful guitar solos both introducing songs and stringing them together. It was also the birthday of lead singer and citizen of Canada James LaBrie. As is Dream Theater tradition, Portnoy came down from the drumset to present James with a birthday cake: “On this cake it says, ‘Happy Birthday, You Fucking Canuck’”. After the audience joined in a rendition of “Happy Birthday”, LaBrie got the cake in his face. (He was also given a throwback Seahawks jersey, or at least that’s what it looked like from my seats. Speaking of jerseys, Portnoy, who’s been known to wear a personalized Knicks jersey on stage, wore a Kevin Durant Sonics jersey at least during the encore, if not during the entire set. Given the possible relocation of the Sonics to Oklahoma City, the show of support was much appreciated.)

The set was followed by a spoof video, “The Dark Nintendo Night: Super Majesty Brothers” that featured a remix of “The Dark Eternal Night” with Super Mario Brothers. It was an inside joke to Dream Theater fans, but also a pretty decent parody of certain other bands who go for that kind of sound.

Their encore was even better, at least to me, leading in with “Trial of Tears” (one of my favorite Dream Theater songs) and ending with the stirring and operatic finale from “Octavarium”. Overall, I would have been happier if Dream Theater’s setlist had more songs I knew and enjoyed, but it was still a very strong and powerful set, and it had enough to keep me happy.

To conclude, though, I want to note something about Wamu Theater at Qwest Field that’s frankly annoying. Like almost any venue they had restrictions on cameras, recording equipment, weapons, outside food and drink, and so forth. There were two things I didn’t realize going in: first, they enforced this by doing a patdown search of everyone who came in (which was intrusive and annoying, but brief). Second, their idea of “weapon” extends to 2 inch pocketknives. I didn’t think quickly enough to try and smuggle it in (instead of just taking it out when they asked if I had any knives), but in my defense I thought they were checking for knives that could actually be dangerous. They weren’t willing to hold it for me, but they did give me the opportunity to go back and leave it in my car. Since I was parked on the other side of Puget Sound that wasn’t exactly feasible. I didn’t want to take my chances just going to the back of the line and trying to smuggle it in, because if they already knew I had it I wouldn’t be able to get away with it. Nor did I think quickly enough to realize that if I found a hiding place for it somewhere in Sodo, I would at least have some chance of getting it back. My recommendation is to stay away from the Qwest Field event center if you don’t want to be treated like a criminal. This may or may not extend to Qwest Field itself, if you’re going to see the Seahawks or (as of next year!) the Sounders FC.

The hidden symbolism of road signs

Friday, January 25th, 2008

Many motorists view road signs as simply traffic control devices intended to maintain safety and provide information, but in reality, they contain many hidden double and triple meanings, serving to uphold and represent the predominant white-male heteronormative patriarchy. Examples?

Yield

This sign is a prototypical example of masculine sexual power. The wedge shape suggests a purpose of splitting or opening (perhaps with a hammer), as a border of red (symbolic of danger) threateningly surrounds a field of white (symbolic of innocent, virginal womanhood, this symbolism itself rife with racial subtext), with the simple, monosyllabic command to “yield” a mere emphasis of the command. Such sexually-charged displays of dominance demand the (male) driver play the part of the woman, yielding obediently to cross traffic just as a woman is expected to yield obediently to her husband/rapist.

Interestingly, there is a feminine counterpart to the yield sign:

Slippery When Wet

Yellow, symbolic of caution but less directly associated with danger than red, draws the viewer’s eye to the iconic car (a known phallic symbol) treacherously traversing an extremely curved path. The sign’s denotation, “slippery when wet”, simply serves as an encouraging double entendre; while supposedly a caution sign, this sign invites the driver to play the part of the man, boldly traversing the slippery curves ahead, the yellow background symbolizing the accused cowardice he would surely be guilty of were he to not proceed. The overall effect is to portray the woman as a “dangerous” thrill ride presenting herself for male enjoyment: the prostitute.In these two signs alone we have two vastly contradictory portrayals of womanhood, both of which emphasize “traditional” gender roles and male dominance. The virgin bride of the “yield” sign is portrayed as innocent, her virtue in danger from, yet ultimately submitting to, the dominant male. The whore of the “slippery when wet” sign is beckoning and inviting, dangerous, infinitely more interesting but ultimately submissive as well.

Merge Right

The political subtext behind this sign is obvious.

Who is Ron Paul?

Friday, January 11th, 2008

I was reflecting recently on the insurgent, internet-driven candidacy of Ron Paul and I realized something incredible just now.Ron Paul is the libertarian Jesus.Now, I don’t necessarily mean that he’s the savior of libertarians, or that if we repent to him our sins of statism and fiat currency he will bring us political and economic salvation. I’m not too hip on the gold standard anyway, but I think he represents a positive step forward for the popularity of libertarian thinking, particularly in leftist circles. I’ve always thought libertarians wasted too much time coalitioning with the crony capitalist Bible-thumpers of the right and not enough time coalitioning with our fellow non-interventionist civil libertarians on the left. Sure, they’ve got that socialist thinking going on, but even leftists will agree that real capitalism beats crony capitalism any day. And yes, this makes it even stranger that Ron Paul is a Republican, but when I see people like this compare Ron Paul to Kucinich or Gravel, I really wonder.But think about it. Jesus ministered to the prostitutes and tax collectors; Ron Paul ministers to the gold bugs, conspiracy nuts, marijuana advocates, and disaffected leftist hippies. And, just like Jesus, Ron Paul has a very enthusiastic group of folks who really like his message and want to tell everyone about it. And if you ever say a bad word about either of them, then their supporters are coming to your blog.

New York Times is wrong on air security

Saturday, January 5th, 2008

Interesting piece on a New York Times blog arguing for the TSA to handle inspection of cargo placed on passenger planes, instead of letting the airlines do it themselves under TSA supervision. The basic argument?

The Transportation Security Administration largely relies on the airlines to do any screening that is done. But we all should know now from the painful experience of 9/11 that, left to their devices, airlines put profit and speed ahead of security on their list of priorities. 

I tried posting a comment (it’s in their moderation queue as of now but should be posted), but thought I’d share my thoughts here as well. Comment is below:As far as I’ve been able to tell, the TSA itself tends to put inconvenience and the public illusion of security ahead of security itself on its list of priorities.If you investigate the value of United and American Airlines stock before and after 9/11, or Pan Am stock before and after the Lockerbie attack, you will discover a greedy, shallow—but effective incentive for private airlines to secure themselves.What we should know from the painful experience of 9/11 is that airlines, hamstrung by FAA regulations and forced to allow boxcutter knives to be carried on board with no provision of protecting the cockpit from a potential hijacking, lost four crews and hundreds of passengers. They couldn’t have a barricaded cockpit door, because that would violate FAA regulations. They couldn’t have security personnel on board, because that would violate FAA regulations. They couldn’t buy aircraft with cockpits physically inaccessible from the passenger compartment, because FAA regulations prevented any such airplane from being designed and sold. They were required, by FAA regulations, to immediately surrender control of the aircraft to hijackers under a doctrine of “passive compliance”.And after being hamstrung, set up, and forced to allow their property to be turned into missiles targeted at the World Trade Center and Pentagon, it was the airlines, not the FAA, who were blamed for letting it happen.But it’s the flying public who are put through a facade of security by the TSA, and the taxpayers who have to foot the bill.Nonetheless, I can’t see the airlines complaining about the TSA taking over cargo screening, just as they didn’t complain about the TSA taking over passenger screening. Perhaps in a different world we would ask for corporate responsibility—and allow it to happen. In this world, we stand in the way of corporate responsibility, and when the inevitable consequences happen, we let the government do the company’s work (poorly), saving the company money and ultimately leaving no one accountable for getting the job done.

PRIEST FIGHT!

Thursday, December 27th, 2007

This is the most awesome news story I have ever read:

Greek Orthodox and Armenian priests attacked each other with brooms and stones inside the Church of the Nativity as long-standing rivalries erupted in violence during holiday cleaning on Thursday.

And the best part?

Palestinian police, armed with batons and shields, quickly formed a human cordon to separate the two sides so the cleaning could continue, then ordered an Associated Press photographer out of the church.

You know you’ve slipped into bizarro world where the Palestinians are stopping religiously-motivated fighting.

My response to Mitt Romney

Friday, December 7th, 2007

Hypocrisy in the NFL Network dispute

Thursday, November 29th, 2007

I just read perhaps the stupidest argument ever in favor of cable companies not including the NFL Network in their basic cable packages:

Cable companies are also used to having their way — not because they are liked but because, as insulated quasi-monopolies, they don’t see much advantage in being liked. In this particular dispute, however, they happen to be right. They’re saving millions of non-fans from an attempt by the NFL to pick their pockets.The reason the NFL Network is not on most cable systems is the league’s arrogance. It won’t let the cable companies put its channel on a premium tier, where the fans who want it would pay the NFL’s premium price. The network insists that it be included in a basic package, which spreads the costs to all customers, including those who don’t care a whit for football.The NFL wants an average of 80 cents per cable subscriber per month, according to media consulting firm SNL Kagan, making it the fifth most expensive cable channel among 159. Even to the NFL’s fans, that price might seem high for a network that provides about 24 hours per year of live NFL football and about 8,736 hours of filler. For people whose idea of good TV is cooking shows, it must seem downright insane.

Source.Of course, what isn’t mentioned (but what is shown in their graph) is that ESPN and FSN (Fox Sports Network) are the #1 and #2 most expensive channels available, so evidently sports programming (including ESPN’s Monday Night Football) is also “picking the pockets” of cooking-show fans. And TNT, for no good reason at all, is third.But the main flaw with this argument is that it ignores how cable television works in the first place. Here’s a list of the cable channels I can easily get here in Pullman:2 KREM 2 Spokane WA3 KLEW 3 Lewiston ID4 KXLY 4 Spokane WA5 QVC6 KHQ 6 Spokane WA7 KSPS 7 Spokane WA8 Public Access10 KWSU 10 Pullman WA11 Local Bulletin Board12 KUID 12 Moscow ID13 Government Access14 KGPX 34 Spokane WA15 KSKN 22 Spokane WA (CW)16 Educational Access17 KXMN18 KQUP 24 Pullman WA19 HSN20 TV Guide Channel21 CSPAN22 CSPAN 223 The Disney Channel (West)24 ESPN25 ESPN226 Fox Sports Northwest27 CNN28 USA Network (West)29 Discovery Channel (West)30 Nickelodeon (West)31 ABC Family Channel (West)32 AMC – American Movie Classics (West)33 A&E (West)34 CNN Headline News35 The Weather Channel36 VH1 (West)37 MTV: Music Television (West)38 TNT – Turner Network Television (West)39 Comedy Central (West)40 Spike TV (West)41 E! Entertainment Television (West)42 Sci Fi Channel (West)43 Fox News Channel44 CNBC45 TLC – The Learning Channel (West)46 Cartoon Network (West)47 CMT – Country Music Television (West)48 Northwest Cable News49 Animal Planet50 TV Land (West)51 Court TV (West)52 Travel Channel53 The History Channel (West)54 FX55 Bravo56 TBS Superstation57 HGTV – Home & Garden Television58 Lifetime Television59 Hallmark Channel60 Shop NBC61 Food Network62 Inspiration/EWTN63 MSNBC64 Oxygen65 BET – Black Entertainment Television66 MTV270 College Sports TVNow, since I’m a non-Christian white male, about four of these channels are of no interest to me right off the bat. Let’s take out Lifetime, Inspiration/EWTN, Oxygen, and BET. MTV is a waste of time lately so let’s take out both of their channels. I don’t have any children so the Disney channel can go (Cartoon Network stays because of Adult Swim). Nickelodeon is questionable, because the only two shows Nick at Nite still have that I would want to watch are The Cosby Show and Home Improvement. But let’s keep it anyway. I certainly don’t want to buy things from TV shows, so Shop NBC, HSN, and QVC are out. Fox News is out because I’m not interested in right-wing propaganda. All, told, of all those channels, here are all the ones that would “pick my pockets”:5 QVC19 HSN23 The Disney Channel (West)31 ABC Family Channel (West)36 VH1 (West)37 MTV: Music Television (West)41 E! Entertainment Television (West)43 Fox News Channel44 CNBC47 CMT – Country Music Television (West)51 Court TV (West)54 FX55 Bravo56 TBS Superstation57 HGTV – Home & Garden Television58 Lifetime Television59 Hallmark Channel60 Shop NBC62 Inspiration/EWTN63 MSNBC64 Oxygen65 BET – Black Entertainment Television66 MTV2Even worse, the channels that remain are clogged with ads 1/3 of the time during normal programming (a 30-minute program is slightly over 20 minutes in length, an hour program is in reality slightly more than 40 minutes), and all of the time at night. (Home shopping channels are by definition clogged with ads 24/7, and I’m not entirely sure why people even watch them. Honestly I would have more fun watching Ron Popeil infomercials than that dreck.) And half of the channels I am selecting, I’m only choosing for specific circumstances. I get all my news from the Internet—CNN is only valuable to me in rare circumstances, and the only thing I would really miss from losing a channel like CNN is being able to watch live coverage when something like 9/11 happens. SciFi is only valuable because of Battlestar Galactica. Spike is generally useful only for Star Trek reruns.The problem here is not with a greedy NFL. The problem is with the cable TV system. Am I really supposed to believe that there are fewer NFL fans in this country than criminal justice system fans?

300

Saturday, October 27th, 2007

Well, I finally got around to seeing it. It was probably more impressive in the theater, of course, and I regret not seeing it there. Visually, it was impressive. Unique, even. While I never read the original comic it seems very faithful to what the style of the comic must have been. In terms of the production value, battle sequences, and so forth, it was very good. Of course, there was some disturbing subtext:

  • Infanticide is a crucial part of the social order.
  • Foreigners are inhuman monsters. People with congenital defects are not to be trusted. Black people are evil. Asians are evil. People from the Middle East are evil. And they aren’t very manly, either.
  • Warlike kings are honorable and trustworthy, pacifists are not to be trusted. Any check against the leader’s power to make war is antiquated, and anyone who tries to uphold those laws is actually a traitor.

Sure, you may point out that some (but not all) of these ideas were prevalent in ancient Sparta. That’s not the point. Ancient Sparta was what it was—portraying them as artificially noble and freedom-living while vilifying the Persians turns it from epic to cartoonish. (It’s up to you to decide whether “being cartoonish” is a bad thing for a comic book adaptation.) And yes, it’s disturbing that the primary method of vilifying the Persians was to turn them into non-white queers, in case we ever confused them with the white hetero Spartans. The badass-warrior-culture that goes out and kicks ass is such a great idea that’s pulled off so well in so many other places, but making them sympathetic the way 300 did just blunts that. I want to have some evil in my antiheroes, and 300 bleaches it out, with a lot of implicit bigotry tainting the whole thing.

It was a lot better than I had feared, but I still don’t think it’s nearly as good as people say it was.

I am embarrassed for my university.

Thursday, September 27th, 2007

Nerds to Auction Themselves to Women

PULLMAN, Wash. (AP) — Looking to recruit more women, and perhaps date some sorority girls, the largest computer club at Washington State University hopes to hold a “nerd auction.” The idea is to trade their computer skills to sorority girls in exchange for a makeover and, possibly, a date.

“You can buy a nerd and he’ll fix your computer, help you with stats homework, or if you’re really adventurous, take you to dinner!” Ben Ford, president of the Linux Users Group, said on its Web site recently.

Ford acknowledged that some of the group’s 213 registered members may not be ready for the auction block.

“The problem is that we’re all still nerds. Let’s face it, guys. If anyone’s going to bid on us, we’ll need some spicing up,” he wrote. “And who better to help with that than sorority girls who like nothing better than a makeover?”

Source

This is the dumbest idea I’ve ever heard of. Of course, the entire reason for this was mentioned later on:

This all began as an effort to recruit more women into computer science progams…

Somehow, I doubt that perpetuating the stereotype that college-age women are too stupid to operate and maintain their computers without the assistance of male nerds will help this. (Even if it is true, it’s more of a self-fulfilling prophecy than any inherent problem with women, and perpetuating the stereotype only makes it worse.) And while it’s no secret that computer enthusiasts are generally male nerds with little ability to attract women, I don’t think advertising this generalization will attract women to computer science programs either.

A public relations class decided to help by studying the social dynamics of the Linux group, which focuses on the use of the computer operating system.

Fortunately, it wasn’t the PR class that came up with this dumb idea; it was Ben Ford, in the shower. I say “fortunately” because WSU’s communications department has a good reputation as far as communications departments go, and after this level of national embarrassment I want there to be something left over for WSU to be proud of.